Eksplorasi kualitas pembelajaran daring: Analisis instrumen penilaian, efikasi diri mahasiswa, dan proses pembelajaran

Authors

  • Hery Yanto The Institut Nalanda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62203/jkjip.v2i2.64

Keywords:

pembelajaran daring, pembelajaran jarak jauh, evaluasi pembelajaran, kualitas pembelajaran, strategi pembelajaran

Abstract

Studi kasus ini dilakukan pada pembelajaran daring di Institut Nalanda, dengan fokus pada mata kuliah Evaluasi Pembelajaran I. Penelitian bertujuan mengevaluasi kualitas instrumen penilaian, efikasi diri mahasiswa, dan proses pembelajaran daring. Data dikumpulkan dari 21 mahasiswa melalui survei daring. Instrumen penelitian mencakup evaluasi instrumen tes, evaluasi diri, perkuliahan, ujian, dan strategi belajar. Analisis data menggunakan tampilan hasil otomatis dari Google dan QDA Miner untuk pertanyaan terbuka. Hasilnya, 57,1% mahasiswa merasa yakin bisa mengerjakan tes dengan baik, dan 61,9% menganggap soal membantu mengembangkan kemampuan analisis. Penelitian ini bermanfaat bagi pengajar untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dan mengidentifikasi kekurangan dari perspektif mahasiswa. Hasil penelitian ini juga dapat digunakan untuk memperbaiki strategi pembelajaran daring pada semester yang baru.

References

Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2023). Feedback for learning (R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. B. T.-I. E. of E. (Fourth E. Ercikan (Eds.); pp. 41–49). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09013-8

Akour, M., & Alenezi, M. (2022). Higher Education Future in the Era of Digital Transformation. In Education Sciences (Vol. 12, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110784

Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01663995

Baquero-Vargas, M.-P., & Pérez-Salas, C. P. (2023). Authenticity of Formative Assessment Tasks Reported in Research. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(2).

Bedi, A. (2023). Keep Learning: Student Engagement in an Online Environment. Online Learning, 27(2), 119–136.

Bhati, K., & Sethy, T. (2022). Self-efficacy: Theory to educational practice. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 10(1), 1123–1128.

Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956–983.

Dang, T. N., & Le, T. H. (2023). Students’ Perceptions on Using Rubrics as a Peer and Self-Assessment Tool in EFL Speaking Courses. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 3(3), 119–136.

Fatimah, S., Sari, I. J., & Camara, J. S. (2023). The Implementation of Case-based Learning Approach in the Classroom: A Systematic Review. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(2), 110–116.

Gritsova, O. A., & Tissen, E. V. (2021). Quality assessment of online learning in regional higher education systems. Ekonomika Regiona= Economy of Regions, 3, 929.

Harjanto, A. S., & Sumarni, S. (2021). TEACHERS’EXPERIENCES ON THE USE OF GOOGLE CLASSROOM. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 3, 172–178.

Indrawati, B. (2020). Tantangan dan peluang pendidikan tinggi dalam masa dan pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 1(1), 39–48.

Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43, 309–322.

Kuo, Y.-C., Lin, H.-C. K., Lin, Y.-H., Wang, T.-H., & Chuang, B.-Y. (2023). The influence of distance education and peer self-regulated learning mechanism on learning effectiveness, motivation, self-efficacy, reflective ability, and cognitive load. Sustainability, 15(5), 4501.

Liu, Z.-Y., Lomovtseva, N., & Korobeynikova, E. (2020). Online learning platforms: Reconstructing modern higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(13), 4–21.

Nair, L. B., Gibbert, M., & Hoorani, B. H. (Eds.). (2023). Introduction to Case Study Research. In Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building: A New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers (pp. 1–9). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781009023283.001

Olusegun, B. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.

Rambe, S. L. (2021). Creative techniques for online learning assessment. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 8(2), 138–147.

Salamah, W. (2020). Deskripsi penggunaan aplikasi google classroom dalam proses pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 4(3), 533–538.

Setiawan, J., Sudrajat, A., & Kumalasari, D. (2021). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill Assessment Instruments in Learning Indonesian History. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 545–552.

Sukenti, D., Tambak, S., & Siregar, E. (2021). Learning Assessment for Madrasah Teacher: Strengthening Islamic Psychosocial and Emotional Intelligence. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 725–740.

Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2017). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76.

Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check