Apakah Realistic Mathematics Education Berpengaruh Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis?

Vera Anzani; Dadang Juandi; Endang Cahya

doi:10.62203/jkjip.v1i2.44

Authors

Vera Anzani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Dadang Juandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Endang Cahya Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62203/jkjip.v1i2.44

Keywords:

Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability, Meta-Analysis, Realistic Mathematics Education

Abstract

Kemampuan berpikir kreatif sangat penting dimiliki oleh siswa terkhusus kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Para peneliti di bidang pendidikan (guru dan dosen) sudah banyak melakukan penelitian dan salah satunya memilih Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) sebagai alternatif dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa jenjang sekolah dasar hingga sekolah menengah atas. Dari 136 studi primer diperoleh 16 studi primer yang sesuai dengan kriteria inklusi. Selain itu, effect size yang diperoleh berdasarkan pengujian keseluruhan studi pengaruh RME terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa adalah 0,973 dengan besar pengaruh tersebut dikategorikan berpengaruh sedang. Berdasarkan karakteristik studi pada penelitian ini ukuran sampel, jenjang pendidikan, dan demografi siswa bukan menjadi faktor heterogennya kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa. Studi ini memberikan masukan pada guru dan dosen matematika bahwa mereka sebaiknya memilih RME sebagai alternatif pembelajaran matematika untuk diterapkan terutama pada jenjang sekolah menengah atas dalam menumbuh kembangkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis.

References

Asdarina, O. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Materi Desimal melalui Penerapan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) di MIN Tungkop Aceh Besar: Vol. V (Issue 1).

Bellamy, C. (2007). Online Democratic Deliberation in a Time of Information Abundance. Fast Capitalism, 2(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.200701.011

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

Borenstein, M. (2009). Common mistakes in meta-analysis and how to avoid them. John Willey and.

Cleophas, T. J., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2017). Meta-analysis in a Nutshell. In Modern Meta-Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55895-0_1

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding The New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis by Geoff Cumming. In International Statistical Review (Vol. 80, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00187_26.x

Dwipayana, I. K. A. A., & Diputra, K. S. (2019). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Berbasis Open Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Journal of Education Technology, 2(3), 87. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v2i3.16380

Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. BMJ, 316, pp. 469 – 477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1996). Models for estimating the number of unpublished studies. Statistics in Medicine, 15(23), 2493–2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961215)15:23<2493::AID-SIM381>3.0.CO;2-C

Higgins, J., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-006-2974-4

Iskandar, J. (2015). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP Dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 861–866.

Ismunandar, D., Gunadi, F., Taufan, M., Mulyana, D., & Runisah. (2020). Creative thinking skill of students through realistic mathematics education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012054

Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). Pengantar Analisis Meta (J. A. Dahlan (ed.)). UPI PRESS.

Kusmaryono, I., & Maharani, H. R. (2021). Imagination And Creative Thinking Skills Of Elementary School Students In Learning Mathematics : A Reflection Of Realistic. 9(2), 287–308.

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. In Journal of clinical epidemiology (Vol. 62, Issue 10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE Publication Inc. https://doi.org/https://rogeriofvieira.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Wilson.pdf

Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic review and meta-analysis. In Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2017.10.012

Mike, W., & Cheung, L. (2015). a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118957813

Ndiung, S., Sariyasa, Jehadus, E., & Apsari, R. A. (2021). The effect of treffinger creative learning model with the use rme principles on creative thinking skill and mathematics learning outcome. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 873–888. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14249a

Puspitasari, R. Y., & Airlanda, G. S. (2021). Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu.

Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Willey and Son Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168

Sabandar, J. (2007). Berpikir Reflektif. Makalah Pada Seminar Tingkat Nasional FPMIPA UPI Bandung.

Shelby, L. B., & Vaske, J. (2008). Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701881366

Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27(June 2018), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.007

Tamur, M., Juandi, D., & Adem, A. M. G. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education in Indonesia and Recommendations for Future Implementation: A Meta-Analysis Study. JTAM | Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika, 4(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1786

Wajdih, M. F., Kusumayanti, A., Latuconsina, N. K., & Nursalam, N. (2020). Meta-Analisis Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education (Rme) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Al Asma : Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v2i2.17340

Yunita, Y., Juandi, D., Tamur, M., Adem, A. M. G., & Pereira, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the effects of problem-based learning on students’ creative thinking in mathematics. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 13(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v13i2.380